NSW Coat of ArmsDepartment of Premier and Cabinet
Contact Print this page Reduce font size Reduce font size Increase font size

Good Practice: Receive/Process Applications

Good Practice: Receive and Process Applications

  • Use the NSW model application form to develop a standard application form for each funding program.
  • Restrict information collected to only what is necessary to assess applications against published program criteria.
  • Use available technologies for applications lodgement and assessment processes.
  • Establish a transparent process with the minimum number of administrative layers for assessment and approval of applications.
  • Fully document funding recommendations and decisions.
  • Advise successful and unsuccessful grants applicants at the same time and as quickly as possible following Ministerial approval.

Guidelines and Resources

Applications

Applications should follow a standard format to allow for a fair comparison of applicants and an objective assessment of their capabilities and the project feasibility against the grants program criteria.

A model application form is provided which can be used to develop a standard form for different grants programs while maintaining a consistent cross government approach to language and information collected.

Note: The application form, first released in 2004, has been updated consistent with the model templates provided on this site for project planning and monitoring and acquittal processes.

The model application form has three parts:

  1. Registration designed to obtain details of the applicant organisation, its structure and legal status and contact details. Only the minimum amount of information should be sought to meet accountability requirements.
  2. Project funding with core questions to collect information against the criteria for community project funding programs.
  3. Service provider funding with core questions to collect information against criteria for service delivery funding programs.
Grants Managers: Grants Applicants:
  • Contact grant giving agencies for the appropriate application form. Follow this link to communitybuilders.

Model process templates can be customised and used according to this basic guide to Using Model Forms.

Assessment Grants programs must have criteria against which applications are assessed. The full criteria should be published when promoting the program and decisions must be made on the basis of the published criteria.

The grants assessment process should be as transparent as possible and have a minimum number of administrative layers. Assessment should include a recommendation stage and a decision making stage. A personal 'statement of conflict of interest' on behalf of any person involved in the assessment of applications should be formally made and recorded.

Wherever possible, processing should utilise the current technologies that are available, such as the Internet.

Adhere to the timetable provided in the published guidelines as circumstances may change with the passage of time for either the applicant or the grant giving agency. Deal with the assessment process promptly to avoid unnecessary uncertainty and provide a written response to both successful and unsuccessful applicants.

Follow this link to a Model Grant Application Assessment Form. Model process templates can be customised and used according to this basic guide to Using Model Forms.

Model assessment process

Steps Actions
1. Cull Initial eligibility cull by grants administration officer completed against the grants program criteria.
2. Summary If ineligible to be considered: Submission to Minister. Letter to applicant with reason signed by CEO or delegate.
If eligible: Grants administration officer develops summary of all applications.
3. Committee Establish Grants Advisory Committee. Include representative(s) from another agency, stakeholder groups, and an independent person. Agencies with a regional presence include regional staff. In larger agencies include program staff.
4. Assessment Undertake assessment against criteria.
  • Develop and use a standard template.
  • Document reasons for decisions.
5. Recommendation Grants Advisory Committee makes recommendation to CEO or delegated officer. Detail the procedures followed and the selection criteria used.
6. Decision-making Minister's or delegated officer's approval based on whether:
  • The financial assistance is in line with the goals of the program
  • Costs and other aspects appear reasonable
  • That sufficient funds are available; and
  • The assessment is fully justified and documented.
Record decisions and any variance to recommendation with reason.
7. Announcement Public announcement if required. Written advice to unsuccessful applicants with reasons for lack of success.
Contact Print this page Reduce font size Reduce font size Increase font size